The Solar Bill of Rights
January 27, 2010
The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), the trade association for the solar industry, recently published a ‘Solar Bill of Rights’ for the United States. The eight-point bill, reproduced below, appears not to contain any revolutionary concepts; nothing in it should appear unreasonable, irrational or excessive. Yet every one of the points listed is there because it has been, and in many cases still is being, resisted or abrogated by authority.
Of course, that other Bill of Rights—the eighteenth century one—was considered revolutionary at the time, and only in retrospect was seen to be unequivocally fair and reasonable. So if that seminal document from the early days of our nation could pass from being avant-garde to being accepted, how much more readily should these ‘solar’ rights, unquestionably fair, be accepted today?
Take a look at the Solar Bill of Rights and determine whether you feel Americans are entitled to them, whether they contain truths that are, in the words of another historic document of the time, “self-evident.” If you think so, perhaps your local and state officials need to consider adopting them too.
The Solar Bill of Rights
We declare these rights not on behalf of our companies, but on behalf of our customers and our country. We seek no more than the freedom to compete on equal terms and no more than the liberty for consumers to choose the energy source they think best.
1. Americans have the right to put solar on their homes and businesses.
Millions of Americans want to put solar on the roof of their home or business, but many are prevented from doing so by local restrictions. Some Homeowners’ Associations have prevented residents from going solar through neighborhood covenants, which allow for the association to veto any changes to a property’s aesthetics. Some utilities and municipalities have also made it prohibitively time-consuming and/or expensive to have a system permitted or inspected.
2. Americans have the right to connect their solar energy system to the grid with unifrom national standards.
Currently, each state (in some cases, each utility) has a unique process for connecting solar systems to the local electricity grid. National interconnection standards will create a uniform process and paperwork, creating a simple process for the homeowner and a standardized physical connection for manufacturers. Connecting a home solar system shouldn’t be any more complicated for the homeowner than setting up an Internet connection.
3. Americans have the right to net meter and be compensated at the very least with full retail electricity rates.
Residential solar systems generate excess electricity in the middle of the day, when the owners aren’t usually at home. Net metering requires the utility company to credit any excess generation to the customer at full retail rates at a minimum – effectively running the electricity meter backwards when the system is generating more electricity than the occupants of the house are using. Allowing customers to net meter is critical to making solar an economically viable option for most homeowners.
4. The solar industry has the right to a fair competitive environment.
The highly profitable fossil fuel industries have received tens of billions of dollars in subsidies from the federal government for decades. In addition, fossil fuel industries are protected from bearing the full social costs of the pollution they produce. The solar energy industry and the public expect a fair playing field, with all energy sources evaluated based on their full, life-cycle costs and benefits to society. Therefore it is critical that solar energy receive the same level of support, for the same duration, as the fossil fuel industry.
5. The solar industry has the right to equal access to public lands.
America has some of the best solar resources in the world, which are often on public lands overseen by the federal government. But even though oil and gas industries have been granted access to 45 million acres of public lands, the federal government has yet to approve a single solar project application for development. Solar is a clean, renewable American resource and access to public lands is a critical component of any national strategy to expand our use of renewable energy.
6. The solar industry has the right to sell its power across a new, 21st-century transmission grid.
Over the last 100 years, the transmission grid in the United States has been built as a patchwork of local systems, designed and planned to meet local needs. As the needs of customers have changed, so has the way the electric industry does business. What haven’t changed are the rules crafted in an era of coal-fired power plants. What is needed now is an investment in infrastructure to connect areas rich in solar resources with major population centers.
7. Americans have the right to buy solar electricity from their utility.
Many utility companies have never considered offering their customers the option to purchase clean solar energy, rather than dirty energy from coal or other fossil fuels. Nationwide, over 90% of people support increased use of solar energy, and over three-quarters believe it should be a major priority of the federal government. Despite this, only around 25% of utility customers in the US have the ability to actually purchase clean, renewable power from their utility, and only a fraction of those programs offer solar energy. Utilities should be required to offer the electricity source that their customers want.
8. Americans have the right to – and should expect – the highest ethical treatment from the solar industry.
Solar energy systems are an investment as much as a physical product. Consumers deserve top-quality information and treatment from solar energy providers and installers. Consumers should expect the solar industry to minimize its environmental impact through panel recycling and other programs, and communicate information about available incentives in a clear, accurate and accessible manner. Finally, consumers should expect that solar systems will work better than advertised, and that companies will make every good faith effort to support solar owners over the life of their systems.
January 29th, 2010 at 1:35 pm
I totally agree
January 29th, 2010 at 1:36 pm
My utility would not allow a meter that would go backwards, instead demanding a double meter that credited me only for the electricity actually transmitted back to the utility. I had to agree to this in order to be connected. What is your opinion?
January 29th, 2010 at 2:40 pm
YES !!! This Bill of Rights needs to be promoted asnd adopted by our federal government as soon as possible !!!
January 29th, 2010 at 3:13 pm
My utility, a coop, used to insist I buy a $1,000,000 liability policy to protect THEM in case my solar array caused harm to their repair people during an outage. They have come beyond that, but will pay only 5% of what they charge if they get power from my system. I will go batteries.
February 2nd, 2010 at 1:05 pm
To John J.B. Miller:
Without trying to be prejudicial and elitist, I have to say that you’re a victim of where you live. The Lone Star state has an extremely poor performance record re net metering and interconnection.
For reasons of your privacy, I won’t publicize the name of your town, but will assume your electricity comes from an investor-owned utility.
You’re right; with a single meter, you are bound to be credited for your generation at the same rate you would normally pay - the utility sees your net consumption and bills you accordingly. Of course, the utility may still choose to reimburse you for surplus generation at a rate of their choosing, and/or limit the amount by which you can roll over excess generation into trhe next billing period.
With a second meter recording just the electricity generated by your own system, the utility is able to make reimbursement at whatever rate it chooses. To quote from the IREC ‘Freeing the Grid’ report of November 2009: “The Public utilities Commission of Texas (PUCT) determined that it would… require customers installing renewable DG to separately meter all electricity outflows (and that) payment for those outflows would be provided at a utility’s avoided cost” (i.e., wholesale rate).
I don’t have the space here to describe the debacle of net metering in Texas; suffice it to say that confusion over the term ‘net metering’ at the Electric Reliability Council of Texas and the PUCT compromised Governor Perry’s attempt to accelerate solar deployment. In the absence of a clearly defined term, the earlier law was struck down with nothing to replace it except ’surplus energy’ metering, a poor substitute.
I spoke to one of the authors of the IREC report, who pointed out that since the Texas legislature is not even meeting this year, no remediation will be possible until 2011.
Not that I’m trying to make you feel even worse, but Texas features in the IREC report’s ‘Worst Practices’ section.
May I direct you to the IREC report here:
http://www.newenergychoices.org/uploads/FreeingTheGrid2009.pdf
in particular, PDF pages 12, 81, and 90-92 of 112.
There are groups like VoteSolar.org who will go in to bat for you at the appropriate time, but I’m afraid that, for now, net metering in Texas doesn’t exist as such.
February 2nd, 2010 at 1:38 pm
The Kerrville Public Utility Board is city-owned.
February 2nd, 2010 at 10:48 pm
First-rate blog. You have gained a recent regular reader. Please maintain the nice posts and I look forward to more of your interesting updates.
February 7th, 2010 at 5:38 pm
Google blog search is always great for finding new stuff! I was trying to figure out how to install an attic ventilator.. Don’t know why this one came up!
March 10th, 2010 at 10:05 pm
yeah, this is very informative and useful.
keep up great writing.